Common Team Building Mistakes in Regulatory Writing Teams

Building a strong and effective regulatory writing team is a crucial task for any organization operating in highly regulated industries. The team’s work is essential for obtaining market approval, meeting regulatory requirements and standards, and mitigating regulatory risk. However, several common mistakes in team building can undermine these efforts and lead to inefficiencies, missed deadlines, and even penalties. Here are five critical missteps and how they can impact your team’s performance.

1. Hiring the Wrong People for the Job

One of the most significant mistakes in team building is failing to align hiring decisions with the specific needs of the function. Regulatory writing roles require a combination of strategic thinking, technical expertise, attention to detail, and strong communication skills. Hiring individuals who lack any of the necessary qualifications or industry experience can lead to costly errors and inefficiencies.

Problem: Employees without the right skills may find it challenging to accurately interpret and apply regulations and guidance, increasing the risk of rejection or noncompliance. Furthermore, those lacking essential soft skills may face difficulties collaborating with other teams or managing projects efficiently and effectively.

Solution: Develop detailed job descriptions that clearly outline the required skills, qualifications, and experience. Incorporate technical assessments and situational interviews into the hiring process to ensure candidates possess the capabilities needed for success. Don’t settle for candidates that don’t meet all your criteria or that you have doubts abouts. Take quick action when it becomes apparent that employees are unable to meet the expectations that have been set for the role.

Check out this blog post for more insights around hiring the right medical writer!

2. Overextending the Team

Regulatory teams are often tasked with handling numerous projects with different regulatory requirements simultaneously. When teams are overburdened, the quality of work can suffer, and employees are more likely to experience burnout.

Problem: Overextended teams are prone to missed deadlines, higher attrition rates, and declining morale, all of which can jeopardize success.

Solution: Assess the workload regularly and ensure adequate staffing levels. Implement project management tools to prioritize tasks and allocate resources effectively. When necessary, consider outsourcing specific functions to outside contractors to alleviate pressure on internal teams and create space for more effective resourcing solutions.

Read more at this blog post about resourcing for the new year.

3. Inadequate Review of Work

In regulatory roles, meticulousness is not optional; it’s a requirement. Failure to establish robust review processes can lead to errors in submissions, overlooked requirements, or inconsistencies in documentation.

Problem: Inadequate review processes can result in additional regulatory scrutiny, program delays, fines, or damaged organizational reputation.

Solution: Establish clear review processes and quality control measures. Train reviewers on what to look for to ensure that deliverables are accurate and align with both regulatory and organizational standards. Ensure that the review process and timeline support not only thorough review, but also incorporation of reviewer feedback and stakeholder alignment on the final result.  Provide prompt and detailed feedback to employees and hold them accountable for incorporating this feedback.

4. Insufficient Training

Regulations and industry standards are constantly evolving. Without ongoing training and a means to stay current on regulatory trends, team members may struggle to keep up with changes, leading to outdated practices and increasing regulatory risk.

Problem: A poorly trained and informed team is ill-equipped to navigate complex regulatory landscapes, increasing the likelihood that submissions will require multiple rounds of Health Authority or Notified Body questions and responses for clearance and approval.

Solution: Invest in continuous professional development programs and an internal regulatory intelligence process. Offer training sessions, workshops, and access to resources (such as a regulatory knowledge notebook) that help team members stay current with regulatory changes and best practices.

5. Lack of Strategic Vision

A strong regulatory team requires more than operational efficiency; it also needs strategic alignment with organizational goals. Without a clear vision, the team may focus on short-term compliance needs while neglecting long-term objectives.

Problem: A lack of strategic direction can result in reactive rather than proactive compliance efforts, leaving the organization vulnerable to emerging risks.

Solution: Develop a strategic roadmap for the regulatory team that aligns with broader business objectives. Foster a culture of proactive compliance by encouraging forward-thinking and risk assessment practices.

Conclusion

Building an effective regulatory team requires thoughtful planning and execution. By avoiding these common pitfalls—hiring mismatches, overextending the team, inadequate work review, insufficient training, and lack of strategic vision—organizations can create a team that not only meets compliance requirements but also drives operational excellence. Investing in the right people, processes, and strategies ensures that your regulatory team becomes a valuable asset, safeguarding the organization’s reputation and success.

‍